Ensenta Workflow
- 2 Minutes to read
- Print
- DarkLight
- PDF
Ensenta Workflow
- 2 Minutes to read
- Print
- DarkLight
- PDF
Article summary
Did you find this summary helpful?
Thank you for your feedback
This article covers two workflows for Ensenta—the Standard workflow and Narmi's real-time posting workflow.
Standard Workflow
When a user is in the mobile app and completing a mobile check deposit, the following steps always occur for a client with Ensenta.
- Narmi sends the following information to Ensenta when the mobile deposit session is initiated:
- Account holder Names (primary and secondary)
- Email address
- IP address
- AccountHolderAttribute with AttributeName = Tier
- AttributeValue = [Name of mapped segment]
- The user completes the check image capture on their mobile device and submits the deposit.
- Ensenta's Risk Mitigation Engine validates the check information:
- Uploaded image is a check (via OCR)
- Check date
- Deposit amount
- MICR line (routing number, account number, check number)
- Restricted endorsement
- The remote deposit is accepted and moves into review queues based on FI's determined risk rules/routing (e.g., back signature not detected → Needs Review Queue).
- Your institution's staff logs in to EZAdmin to review queues and hold, approve, or adjust (up/down) amounts.
- Every day after your institution's selected cut-off time, Ensenta generates an X9 file (or "cash letter file") for manual or automated transmission to the Item Processor Vendor or FRB.
- Item Processor Vendor submits the X9 file to the Federal Reserve Bank or presentment point for settlement.
- Your institution’s segment-specific $ limits and hold days apply for fund availability.
- Your institution can opt to send email notifications to users with copies of checks and subsequent notifications for changes in deposit status.
Note: Narmi posts RDC transactions directly to the core banking system. Narmi is not dependent on the Ensenta system to do so.
Add-on Services
The following steps occur for add-on services that can be purchased.
Integrated Fraud Check
- Upon remote deposit acceptance, deposits that meet your institution's set dollar threshold will be sent from Ensenta to EWS:
- Routing number
- Account number
- Check number
- EWS returns risk factors in categories that route deposits to a client's defined Ensenta review queues (see table below).
- Checks are reviewed in EZAdmin for approval, adjustments, or decline.
- Your institution's determined segment $ limits and global hold days apply for fund availability.
- Your institution's staff can view a monthly EWS report to review all items sent to EWS during the prior month.
EWS Risk Categories | EWS Best Practices | Ensenta Recommended Queue |
---|---|---|
Open/Active | No hold necessary | One Click Approval |
Informational Hit (Info Hit) | Review account holder history | One Click Approval |
Soft Hit (Moderate risk) | Review account holder history to determine the need for a hold | High Risk* or Needs Review |
Hard Hit (High risk) | Place an extended hold (Reg CC) | High Risk* or Reject |
*High-risk queue is only available with Integrated Fraud Check.
Smart Alerts (Real-Time Fraud Monitoring)
- Upon remote deposit acceptance, a 'Deposit Submitted' alert is sent to Verafin.
- Verafin runs deposit fraud analytics and sends an alert email to your institution if a deposit is potentially fraudulent.
- Your staff uses the Verafin online portal to assist in investigating the deposit.
- Your staff makes the final decision in EZAdmin; the final status "alert" is sent to Verafin.
- Your institution's determined segment $ limits and global hold days apply for fund availability.
Narmi Real-Time Posting Workflow
- The user submits their remote deposit via the Mitek image capture component in the mobile app.
- The deposit is reviewed against your institution's defined risk rules and is pushed to:
- Review queue(s) - managed by your staff in Ensenta EZAdmin
- Reject status - uncommon; only caused by OCR fail or client-determined fraud rule
- Narmi does not know the exact queue a deposit is in, so Narmi posts all deposits in manual review queues to the user's account
- Manual reconciliation in the core is required for any adjustments (e.g., corrected amounts, reversals) made in the EZAdmin Portal during manual review via:
- Direct change in the core system (e.g., reversal, amount adjustment)
- A batch process using an X9 file that contains all rejections within the EZAdmin Portal
- Your institution's determined holds and limits apply for fund availability.
Was this article helpful?